Artikkel 66 — Urgency procedure
GDPR, forordning (EU) 2016/679
Hva sier GDPR Artikkel 66?
Kort svar, rett fra den offisielle teksten
1. In exceptional circumstances, where a supervisory authority concerned considers that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, it may, by way of derogation from the consistency mechanism referred to in Articles 63, 64 and 65 or the procedure referred to in Article 60 …
Kilde: GDPR, forordning (EU) 2016/679, lest 2026-08-14.
| I rettsakten | EU 2016/679 |
| Kapittel | VII · Samarbeid og ensartethet |
| CELEX | 32016R0679 |
| Lest | 2026-08-14 |
Offisiell tekst
Lest hos EUs publikasjonskontor for dette CELEX-nummeret. Ordlyden står slik den er publisert, ingenting er skrevet om eller sammenfattet.
Teksten vises på engelsk. Norsk er ikke et offisielt EU-språk, så den offisielle ordlyden finnes ikke på norsk.
Hopp til et punkt: Punkt 1 · Punkt 2 · Punkt 3 · Punkt 4
1. In exceptional circumstances, where a supervisory authority concerned considers that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, it may, by way of derogation from the consistency mechanism referred to in Articles 63, 64 and 65 or the procedure referred to in Article 60, immediately adopt provisional measures intended to produce legal effects on its own territory with a specified period of validity which shall not exceed three months. The supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate those measures and the reasons for adopting them to the other supervisory authorities concerned, to the Board and to the Commission.
2. Where a supervisory authority has taken a measure pursuant to paragraph 1 and considers that final measures need urgently be adopted, it may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision from the Board, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision.
3. Any supervisory authority may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision, as the case may be, from the Board where a competent supervisory authority has not taken an appropriate measure in a situation where there is an urgent need to act, in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision, including for the urgent need to act.
4. By derogation from Article 64(3) and Article 65(2), an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be adopted within two weeks by simple majority of the members of the Board.
Andre artikler i kapitlet
- Article 60
- Article 61
- Article 62
- Article 63
- Article 64
- Article 65
- Article 67
- Article 68
- Article 69
- Article 70
- Article 71
- Article 72
Hvem gjelder dette for
Registeret navngir fem roller. Åpne en rolle for å se pliktene rettsakten legger på den, hver rad med artikkel og kilde.
Gjelder dette oss?
- Do ai governance rules apply to a cloud provider?
- Do personal data rules apply to a cloud provider?
- Do cross-border data rules apply to a cloud provider?
- Do cybersecurity rules apply to a cloud provider?
- Do health data rules apply to a cloud provider?
- Do online platforms rules apply to a cloud provider?
Alle roller i registeret · Alle spørsmål per rolle
Teksten er sitert fra den offisielle kilden og er ikke juridisk rådgivning. En nasjonal domstol leser språkversjonen som binder i sin jurisdiksjon.
Tilbake til rettsakten · EU-rettsakter, lest helt ned til nasjonal lov
ExploreWorldAI is operated by Valkiv Ventures AB (Reg. no. 556995-1311), Kungsgatan 8, 111 43 Stockholm, Sweden. EU-hosted, with data processing assessed against the GDPR. Contact: hello@exploreworldai.com.
Machine-readable summaries for AI agents: /llms.txt and /llms-full.txt.